Faizon Brandon: Tennessee QB Commit with Elite Production and NFL Tools
The Grimsley quarterback leads all Top247 QBs with a 72.5% completion rate and 29-1 record. His PrepRanks score of 91.14 reveals elite traits with surprising recruiting gaps.


Faizon Brandon
View Full Profile →A 72.5% career completion rate ranks best among all Top247 quarterbacks in the 2026 class. That stat belongs to Faizon Brandon, Grimsley's 6'3.5" dual-threat quarterback who committed to Tennessee in August 2025. His PrepRanks score of 91.14 reflects perfect elite recognition, but here's the contradiction: he holds just 14 offers and his national ranking sits at #33 overall. For a quarterback with a 29-1 record as a starter and state championship perfection, that gap between production and perception tells you everything about where the value lies.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Brandon's statistical profile doesn't just validate his ranking. It exceeds it. In his 2024 championship season at Grimsley, he completed 77.1% of his passes for 2,814 yards with 35 touchdowns against just two interceptions. That 17.5:1 touchdown-to-interception ratio is elite by any measure. But statistics alone don't separate good quarterbacks from franchise prospects. The context matters more.
He led Grimsley to a perfect 16-0 record and a 4A state championship. As a junior in 2023, he posted similar numbers with a 13-1 record, throwing for 3,026 yards with 36 touchdowns and three interceptions. Over two years as a starter, Brandon has thrown 71 touchdowns against five interceptions. That's a 14.2:1 ratio across 30 games. Most quarterbacks peak with one elite season. Brandon sustained excellence across two years while adding 1,153 rushing yards and 18 rushing touchdowns.
His rushing ability matters. At 8.0 yards per carry in his championship season, he's not scrambling out of desperation. He's making defenses pay for bringing pressure without a spy. The film shows designed quarterback runs, but more importantly, it shows a quarterback who extends plays and picks up chunks of yardage when the passing game stalls. That's the difference between a system quarterback and someone who wins games when the system breaks down.
Breaking Down the PrepRanks Score
Brandon's 91.14 PrepRanks score reflects elite quarterback traits with one notable weakness. Here's the breakdown:
Component | Score | Max | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Service Average | 47.47 | 50 | 95% |
Momentum | 10 | 25 | 40% |
Position Scarcity | 6.67 | 15 | 44% |
Stability | 4 | 10 | 40% |
Elite Recognition | 10 | 10 | 100% |
TOTAL | 91.14 | 100 | 91.14% |
The service average of 47.47 out of 50 is exceptional. 247Sports rates him 98 with a five-star designation. ESPN gives him 91, also five stars. ON3 comes in at 94 with four stars. That consensus reflects evaluators who see franchise quarterback potential but differ on timeline and ceiling. His perfect elite recognition score (10/10) validates what the awards say: Gatorade North Carolina Player of the Year, MaxPreps North Carolina Player of the Year, and 247Sports National Combine "Alpha Dog." Those aren't participation trophies. They're markers of exceptional talent.
Here's where it gets interesting. His momentum score sits at just 10 out of 25. That suggests his ranking has stabilized rather than surged. Most elite quarterbacks show dramatic ranking climbs during their junior year. Brandon's rankings have remained steady, which could indicate evaluators locked in their assessment early or that he hasn't shown the upward trajectory they're looking for. His moderate stability score (4/10) reflects slight variance in service rankings but nothing alarming.
The position scarcity score (6.67/15) seems low for a quarterback. Elite quarterbacks typically max this category because the supply never meets demand. Brandon's moderate score suggests evaluators see him as a quality Power Four starter but not the generational talent that commands premium scarcity value. That distinction matters for projection.
What the Scouts See
247Sports director of scouting Andrew Ivins compared Faizon Brandon to Geno Smith, the Seattle Seahawks quarterback who had a career resurgence after bouncing between teams. That comparison tells you something specific. Ivins sees a "box-checking quarterback with the arm talent and dual-threat athleticism to light up scoreboards on Saturdays and then eventually Sundays." The Geno Smith reference suggests a quarterback who might take time to develop but has legitimate NFL tools.
The scouting report highlights his arm talent first. Brandon "uses a sturdy base and a smooth release to rip lasers to all different corners of the field." The phrase "ball at times will jump out of his hands" is evaluator code for natural velocity without forced effort. He's not straining to make throws. The arm talent is genuine. Ivins notes Brandon "hits his short and intermediate targets with conviction," which aligns with his 72.5% completion rate. Accuracy isn't luck. It's repeatable mechanics.
His mobility gets equal attention. Brandon is "more than capable of moving the chains on designed runs with his power and acceleration." At 8.0 yards per carry in his championship season, he's not a quarterback who runs because he can't throw. He runs because defenses can't stop both dimensions. Ivins specifically mentions his ability to "shake his fair share of pressure" and deliver accurate throws on the move "with both touch and anticipation." Those are franchise quarterback traits.
The critique is instructive. Ivins writes that Brandon "must keep improving as a downfield passer if he wants to reach his franchise-worthy potential." Translation: the deep ball needs work. Most high school quarterbacks dominate with short and intermediate passing. NFL quarterbacks need to stretch defenses vertically. Brandon's completion percentage and touchdown production suggest he's comfortable working underneath. The development question is whether he can add the downfield dimension without sacrificing accuracy.
The composure concern matters too. Ivins notes Brandon "has to also figure out how to maintain composure when the deck is stacked against him." With a 29-1 record, Brandon hasn't faced much adversity at the high school level. College football will test him differently. How he responds to three-and-outs, hostile road environments, and SEC pass rushers will determine whether the Geno Smith comparison holds or becomes a ceiling.
The Service Rankings Spread
The gap between 247Sports' rating (98) and ON3's rating (94) reveals different evaluation philosophies. 247Sports weighs production heavily, and Brandon's stats are elite. His 72.5% completion rate leads all Top247 quarterbacks. His 14.2:1 touchdown-to-interception ratio over two years shows decision-making mastery. 247Sports sees a quarterback who dominated high school competition and projects that dominance to translate at the next level.
ON3's more conservative rating suggests they're weighing competition level and offer quality more heavily. Brandon's 14 total offers include Tennessee and some solid programs, but he's not generating the same recruiting frenzy as consensus top-10 quarterbacks. ON3's #33 national ranking and #3 QB ranking put him in the elite tier but not the transformational category. ESPN's 91 rating splits the difference, acknowledging elite traits while questioning whether the deep ball and pressure response will develop.
Rivals hasn't ranked Brandon, which is notable. When a major service doesn't publish a ranking for a player with Brandon's production, it usually means they haven't completed their evaluation or have concerns they're not ready to publish. The absence of a Rivals ranking creates the stability variance reflected in his PrepRanks score. For Tennessee, that doesn't matter. They evaluated the film, analyzed the production, and committed before the rankings consensus solidified.
Tennessee Fit and Development Path
Tennessee secured Brandon's commitment on August 3, 2024. The timing is significant. They didn't wait for his senior season to see if the ranking climbed. They evaluated his junior film, saw a quarterback with franchise tools and elite production, and locked him up early. That's either confident talent evaluation or a mistake. Given Tennessee's recent offensive success under Josh Heupel, the smart money is on confident evaluation.
The system fit makes sense. Heupel runs a tempo-based attack that values quarterbacks who can process information quickly and make accurate throws to all levels. Brandon's 72.5% completion rate suggests he sees the field well and delivers on time. His RPO experience at Grimsley translates directly to Tennessee's offensive concepts. The dual-threat capability gives Heupel flexibility in the run game without sacrificing downfield passing ability.
Playing time won't come immediately. Tennessee has established depth at quarterback, and they typically develop signal-callers over multiple years. Brandon projects as a redshirt candidate who learns the system, adds weight to his 6'3.5" frame, and refines the downfield passing game. His early enrollment possibility at age 17 gives him a seven-month development advantage if he takes that route. That extra time in the weight room and film study could accelerate his timeline to compete for the starting job.
The developmental arc matters more than the immediate impact. If Brandon continues improving at the same rate he showed between freshman and junior year, Tennessee will have a quarterback with starter tools and multi-year production potential. His Commitment Risk Score of 15 (rated "STABLE") suggests he's locked in with the Volunteers. That stability allows Tennessee to invest in his development without worrying about late-cycle poaching from other programs.
Basketball Background and Athletic Profile
Brandon's basketball experience adds dimension to his quarterback projection. He averaged 11.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, and 2.1 assists per game as a sophomore at Grimsley. Those aren't token participation numbers. He's a legitimate two-sport athlete who uses his basketball skills to enhance his quarterback play. The rebounding average (7.2) at his size suggests he knows how to use his body and find space in traffic. The assists (2.1) show court vision and passing accuracy under pressure.
His Positional Athleticism Transfer score reflects this multi-sport background. Quarterbacks who play basketball typically show better footwork, spatial awareness, and hand-eye coordination than single-sport athletes. Brandon's ability to extend plays and deliver accurate throws on the move connects directly to his basketball skills. The coordination required to rebound in traffic translates to pocket awareness. The vision needed to find open teammates translates to reading defensive coverage.
His Size Premium Index (45) reflects prototypical quarterback size without being exceptional. At 6'3.5" and 200 pounds, he's within the ideal range for Power Five quarterbacks but not the 6'5", 220-pound prototype some programs target. He'll need to add 15-20 pounds of functional muscle to absorb SEC hits, but his frame projects well for that development. His Quarterback Premium Index (88) is elite, reflecting the combination of size, arm talent, mobility, and production that defines franchise quarterback potential.
Elite Recognition and Awards Validation
Brandon's perfect elite recognition score (10/10) isn't subjective. It's based on objective criteria: Gatorade North Carolina Player of the Year, MaxPreps North Carolina Player of the Year, 4A state championship, and 247Sports National Combine "Alpha Dog" designation. Those awards matter because they reflect consensus from different evaluation sources. Gatorade weighs academics and community impact alongside athletic performance. MaxPreps focuses on statistical dominance. The National Combine "Alpha Dog" designation comes from direct measurement and testing.
The state championship validation is what separates Brandon from stat compilers. Plenty of quarterbacks put up numbers in losing efforts. Brandon went 16-0 in his championship season and 13-1 as a junior. That 29-1 record as a starter isn't a coincidence. He's not padding stats in garbage time or benefiting from a weak schedule. North Carolina 4A football is competitive, and Grimsley's path to the championship required wins against quality opponents. His All-CIF South Section Division 3 selection confirms that local evaluators see him as one of the region's best.
The "Alpha Dog" designation from the 247Sports National Combine deserves attention. This isn't a participation award. It's given to the single most impressive performer across all positions at a national event. Brandon stood out among hundreds of elite prospects, which validates what the film and stats suggest: he's a legitimate five-star talent with measurable physical tools to match his production.
The Recruiting Reality Score
Brandon's moderate momentum score (10/25) and recruiting metrics (Market Value Index of 66) reveal a recruitment that stabilized early rather than building to a crescendo. He committed to Tennessee before generating a national bidding war. His offer list includes 14 programs, which is solid but not elite. Most consensus top-10 quarterbacks hold 25+ offers from blue-chip programs. Brandon's offer count suggests he locked in with Tennessee before testing the market fully.
This isn't necessarily negative. Some elite prospects commit early to focus on their senior season and development rather than managing recruitment pressure. Brandon's decision to commit in August 2024 suggests he found the right fit and didn't need validation from additional offers. Tennessee's confidence in offering early indicates they saw something the national market hadn't fully priced in yet. That gap between production and recruitment activity is where value exists.
His Power Five Regional Advantage score (65) reflects North Carolina's solid recruiting exposure without the premium advantages of Texas, Florida, Georgia, or California. North Carolina produces quality prospects, but it lacks the depth and media attention of the top recruiting states. Brandon's ability to earn national recognition from a non-traditional quarterback state validates his talent level. He didn't need a premium zip code to get noticed. The production and tools speak for themselves.
Development Concerns and Growth Areas
The scouting reports consistently mention two development areas: downfield passing and composure under pressure. Brandon's completion percentage (72.5%) and touchdown production (71 over two years) suggest he's mastered the short and intermediate game. The question is whether he can add the vertical dimension without sacrificing accuracy. Most high school quarterbacks work underneath because it's safer and more efficient. College defenses force quarterbacks to attack all levels of the field. Brandon's ability to develop the deep ball will determine his ceiling.
The composure question connects to his limited adversity at the high school level. A 29-1 record means Brandon has rarely faced fourth-quarter deficits or hostile environments where the game plan isn't working. College football will test him differently. SEC road games, third-and-long situations, and comeback drives against elite defenses require a different mental makeup than dominating 4A opponents in North Carolina. How he responds to failure will matter as much as his physical tools.
His moderate stability score (4/10) reflects variance in service rankings, but it could also indicate evaluators are still forming their final opinion. Some services see a future NFL starter. Others see a quality Power Five backup with spot-start capability. That range of projections creates opportunity for Tennessee. If the optimistic evaluation is correct, they secured a franchise quarterback before the market recognized his value. If the conservative evaluation holds, they still have a quality depth piece who can contribute in specific packages.
Comparison to Elite Quarterbacks
Brandon's PrepRanks score (91.14) puts him in the elite tier but below consensus #1 quarterbacks who typically score 95+. His service average (47.47/50) is exceptional, but his moderate momentum (10/25) and recruiting reality scores create separation from the absolute elite. The comparison to Geno Smith is instructive because Smith wasn't a consensus #1 recruit either. He developed over time, found the right situation, and became a productive NFL starter. That's the projection for Faizon Brandon.
His statistical profile (72.5% completion, 14.2:1 TD:INT ratio) exceeds many quarterbacks ranked higher in previous cycles. The gap exists because evaluators question whether his competition level inflates the numbers or because they see development areas that create risk. Brandon's production suggests the former. Quarterbacks with his combination of accuracy, decision-making, and mobility typically succeed at the next level when placed in the right system. Tennessee's offense provides that system.
The value proposition is clear. Brandon isn't the consensus #1 quarterback in the 2026 class, but his production and tools suggest he could outperform his ranking significantly. His 91.14 PrepRanks score reflects elite traits with room for growth. Tennessee secured him before the market fully priced in his value. If he develops the downfield passing game and maintains his accuracy, he'll exceed the Geno Smith comparison and become a multi-year starter with NFL potential.
Senior Season Expectations
Brandon's senior season at Grimsley will either confirm the elite projection or validate the conservative rankings. Can he maintain his completion percentage while attempting more downfield throws? Will he show improved composure in high-pressure situations? Does he add the vertical dimension to his game without sacrificing his elite decision-making? Those questions will determine whether his ranking climbs into the consensus top-10 or stays at #33.
His commitment to Tennessee removes recruitment pressure. He can focus on development rather than managing official visits and offer lists. That stability benefits both parties. Tennessee can invest in the relationship and development without worrying about late-cycle drama. Brandon can work on his craft without the distraction of constant recruiting attention. His Market Value Index (66) suggests moderate buzz but not the frenzy that accompanies consensus five-star quarterbacks.
The smart projection isn't that Brandon becomes a Heisman finalist. It's that he becomes exactly what Andrew Ivins described: a quarterback with the tools to "light up scoreboards on Saturdays and then eventually Sundays." For a player currently ranked #33 nationally with a 72.5% completion rate and 29-1 record, that represents success for everyone involved. Tennessee is betting they can develop his tools into production that exceeds his ranking. Based on his trajectory, production, and elite recognition, that's a bet worth making.